The Slam: Slammables
Are Those... Kayaks?
by wannagrowwings, Washington
We're on the last leg of our journey, the first of the two days before we get back home. We've been about four hours driving when my dad says, "Let's take a rest stop," and pulls up to a McDonald's to use the restroom. I feel a tinge of pride at not emptying my bladder once since we left the hotel room at noon. As we pull up, a woman with red hair and nose plugs asks, "Whoa, are those boats?"
The whole trip we've been traveling with two kayaks on top of the car. Since they didn't fit perfectly on the boat racks, my dad decided to place aluminum ladders on top of the racks, then the kayaks on top of those. And then there's the elaborate system of cinches that I never dare to attempt on my own, for fear of my dad coming up behind me, telling me that I'm doing it all wrong, and the whole process of cinching or uncinching taking twice as long as it should. It seems like every time we take the boats off and uncinch, by the time we get back to recinch he's come up with a better way of doing it. "If you tie the loose ends off under the first hook, then they don't flap in the wind!" "If you throw the part with the hook over from the inside part of the kayak, then there's no need to worry about struggling to get it over from the outside!" "You did it wrong, you have to do it like THIS!"
This isn't the first time our kayaks have gotten someone's attention.
Gas station somewhere in Las Vegas: "Are those canoes?" A young man with a red baseball cap walks up as my brother fills up our gas tank. My dad leans out his already rolled down window, "They're kayaks." This young man ends up telling my brother how his grandmother was dying and how she lived in Las Vegas and how she died in Las Vegas and how he came to visit her at her deathbed in Las Vegas and how he ended up "hanging around, you know…" in Las Vegas for a couple months after the funeral.
Campsite somewhere in Glacier National Park: "Are these wood kayaks?" We're roasting marshmallows in the sunset when an older man walks up to us. "Yep," my dad proudly answers.
"I didn't know that these were still around," the man continues.
"Well, I got them a while ago, but they're still good." The man walks around the car, examining the kayaks, then he continues on, probably back to his own campsite.
When we pull up to a diner to eat some breakfast, there's this little car next to us, and it has boat racks, and four cinches exactly like ours. Instead of wooden frame kayaks, though, it has two shiny yellow new-looking plastic kayaks. And there aren't any ladders. I wonder what the owners of those two new kayaks would think of our clunky wooden ones and the contraption that holds them in place on top of our car.
My dad's eyes light up with every river that we pass, and he asks us, "What would you think of a float down that nice river... there's the water... watching the view, and having fun enjoying ourselves... So, do you want to go?"
We're driving by the Snake River in Montana, and my dad brings up kayaking. Maybe we're all tired of hearing his suggestions, or maybe no one really likes going down rivers, but for whatever reason, we all start moaning. And three to one means we don't go down the Snake River.
As it turned out, we only used the kayaks three times. On the whole trip. Which was a month long.
This is engaging: the narrative is smooth, the dialogue natural, the descriptions vivid.
I think you could revise the last few lines for better rhetorical punch, though. The "kicker" isn't that the trip was a month long, which is where you leave us; rather, the kicker is that you only used the kayaks three times. So save that for last, e.g., "On the whole, month-long trip, we only used the kayaks three times." You could even build it up a little more, e.g. "As it turned out, we didn't go down a lot of rivers. We didn't even go down most rivers. On the whole, month-long trip..."
Jul 30, 2010
I would go farther than that and say you need a "kicker" that goes beyond the irony of using the kayaks only three times and focuses in on your relationship with your dad. As is, this ending is weak. If you never used the kayaks at all, that would be something. If you finally used them at the end of the trip, on some memorable occasion, THAT would be something. But saying that you used them three times just makes me think, "Hmm. Well, I wonder what those three times were like..." There's no punch.
Almost all good creative nonfiction (and most good humor) focuses on human relationships. The funny part of this narrative is not that you only used the kayaks three times, but that your dad remains so blithely confident in the kayaks' usefulness. I'd like to hear your dad make some eternally optimistic comment at the end, just to show that he's undaunted after all that time. That would make his character more interesting.
Of course, your narrative would be even stronger if YOU learned something along the way. Did you learn to be a little more optimistic yourself under your dad's influence? Did you finally confront your dad about the kayaks, and have a dramatic exchange that left you both feeling differently? Did you decide to grab the bull by the horns and defend the kayaks to curious passers-by, even though you knew you would end up hardly using them? Use some poetic license and create more of a dramatic arc for this narrative.
Something else that might help your pacing is to use more parallel structure in your paragraphs. As is, I got confused about the timeline because you introduced each episode with different language. If you picked a particular lead-in ("At a gas station in X state:"... "We're driving through X, and...") and used that consistently to mark the start of each separate episode, it would be easier to follow because it would be clear to the reader that you're relating a series of independent events.
Honestly, I love this whole concept. Your dad constructing intricate mechanisms for tying the kayaks to the roof... people making clueless remarks... it's dynamite material for a humor piece! Just bring it together cohesively -- and bring it home to tell how the experience changed YOU.
Aug 1, 2010
I thought that this was very interesting. However, the ending was a little disappointing. It seemed to me that you were building up to a clever or thought-provoking ending from what I read in the beginning and middle, but when you actually got to the ending, I didn't find anything special about it. I think that you closed it off too suddenly, and the ending was boring and flat. I was reading some of the above critiques, and I thought that some of their suggestions for different endings were very good and that you should consider their advice. I loved the beginning and the middle, but the end leaves a little to be desired. Overall, though, it was a good piece.
Aug 4, 2010

Slammings